Comments: Add a Comment
shlorn 06/07/2009 - 16:59:25
Source looks better, therefore it should have more viewers as an esport right?
If you think thoroughly though, 1.6 should realistically due to it being more popular by the masses of players that like that system more than the source engine style.
I think it has died down because they tried to market the viewers as people that don't play the game to try and watch it, but really I don't know many people who would watch a game without actually having some knowledge or playing it themselves. Therefore as an esport 1.6 has the most chance of success right now.
People are still hoping though that more people will make the jump to source, and yes the fallback of fRoD and others, in addition with CGS downfall was a huge drawback for the source scene, I personally think that source is just going to be the skipped generation of game.
Whatever VALVE or any other company has in store for us next will be huge, they will know from their mistakes that people like the old aspects of the game more, and mix it with amazing graphics and faster paced more exciting play for spectators to watch in awe, and until then I think it's just going to be a 65/35 basic attention ratio between 1.6 and source from the public eye.
The majority of players for any game will always be the casual players, and in this example, show CS:S to be way bigger than Counter-Strike 1.6. Looking at steam stats right now (http://store.steampowered.com/stats/) CS:S has currently 30,000 more players. Its summer, its a little bit past noon, I would say almost at peak play time.
Some say its flawed, but another statistic: Look at Xfire. CS1.6 isn't even listed as a Top10 game (in minutes), yet CS:S sits at a cool 4th spot.
Professional competitive level needs a new game to reign. We have played Counter-strike (1.6 and/or Source) for over 10 years now - To me its boring.
No keyboard no mouse just a controller
No extra money or time to spend on upgrades
Handles everygame where as some games on PC not every1 can handle
Its mainstream due to MLG and its sponsors such as Dr.Pepper
Its just a clear choice.
RedruMThe only place competitve gaming will have make run is on console because every kid has one.No keyboard no mouse just a controller
No extra money or time to spend on upgrades
Handles everygame where as some games on PC not every1 can handle
Its mainstream due to MLG and its sponsors such as Dr.Pepper
Its just a clear choice.
I absolutely agree
GCTVN-JustinIn terms of league and "professional" attraction, yes I believe Counter-Strike Source has passed its prime (as well as 1.6, time to move on imo)The majority of players for any game will always be the casual players, and in this example, show CS:S to be way bigger than Counter-Strike 1.6. Looking at steam stats right now (http://store.steampowered.com/stats/) CS:S has currently 30,000 more players. Its summer, its a little bit past noon, I would say almost at peak play time.
Some say its flawed, but another statistic: Look at Xfire. CS1.6 isn't even listed as a Top10 game (in minutes), yet CS:S sits at a cool 4th spot.
Professional competitive level needs a new game to reign. We have played Counter-strike (1.6 and/or Source) for over 10 years now - To me its boring.
I hate to tell you this but no 1.6 players even use xfire..CSS players are notorious for using CSS so I would say that is very inaccurate.



During that same period, Source LAN tournaments were at an all-time high and players seemed to have more skill on both the professional and amateur scene.
When Cyber Revolution picked up a Source team with big names on the roster, which include clowN, mOE, Ramb0, mustang, pOs, and warmach1ne, who covered that besides their own site or IRC? Not a lot of sites.